The Global Public Health Intelligence Network (GPHIN) was set up as a global network of connected professionals working to rapidly detect, identify, assess, prevent and mitigate threats to human health. GPHIN is managed by the Public Health Agency of Canada’s (PHAC) Centre for Emergency Preparedness and Response (CEPR), which was created in July 2000. The network was disbanded in May 2019.
Curiously, an exact date is not given in public records. To me this is not an oversight. It is rather a deliberate omission to obfuscate an issue.
PHAC would have us believe that the network slowly wound down over the years until it just ceased to exist in the manner in which old soldiers just fade away. It also tried to give the impression that a domestic agenda superceded an international one. However, global pandemics almost by definition become domestic agendas.
What the author would like to know is if PHAC became aware in May 2019 of the emergence of a coronavirus in Wuhan? Through a multilingual GPHIN System which was developed in collaboration with the National Research Council Canada (NRC)--under the Minister of Innovation, Science, and Economic Development--it was undertaking text analytics of Chinese news. Did PHAC detect the emergence of a coronvirus in Wuhan which led to the dismantlement of the system? Did this ultimately lead to the removal of Dr. Qiu Xiangguo and her husband Cheng Keding and up to 15 students for "administrative matters" from the National Microbiology Institute in Winnipeg Canada on July 5, 2019?
Dr. Qiu had close ties with the Level 4 lab of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan. "She sent one of the deadliest viruses on Earth [Ebola], and multiple varieties of it to maximize the genetic diversity and maximize what experimenters in China could do with it, to a laboratory in China that does dangerous gain of function experiments. It has links to the Chinese military"1. She also sent them Nipah viruses.
1. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/canadian-scientist-sent-deadly-viruses-to-wuhan-lab-months-before-rcmp-asked-to-investigate
D. Carlton Rossi
October 12, 2021
WHO scientist wants closer look at Wuhan lab that moved days before COVID-19 outbreak
New York Post
By Natalie O'Neill
August 13, 2021 4:46pm Updated
A Wuhan lab that was quietly moved by Chinese officials in December 2019 — drawing scrutiny from a World Health Organization scientist — operated under a mild safety level protocol where workers weren’t necessarily required to wear masks, officials said in reports.
At least one employee of the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention facility — different than the city’s much-discussed Wuhan Institute of Virology — tested positive for COVID-19 antibodies due to “a family cluster transmission,” though it’s unclear when the tests were conducted, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing a World Health Organization report.
The lab, where Chinese scientists research mild human diseases with bats, was moved near the seafood market where the first COVID-19 cases were found just days before the outbreak, WHO investigators said.
The revelation comes as Dr. Ben Embarek, the Danish head of a WHO-led team of investigators that probe the viruses’ origins, said in an interview this week that more information is needed about the lab’s move.
“It’s interesting that the lab relocated on the 2nd of December 2019: That’s the period where it all started,” Embarek, a food safety and animal diseases expert, said in a documentary that aired on the Danish television channel TV2.
“We know that when you move a lab, it disturbs everything…That entire procedure is always a disruptive element in the daily work routine of a lab,” he said.
https://nypost.com/2021/08/13/who-scientist-eyes-on-wuhan-lab-that-moved-before-pandemic/
The Wuhan CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) was a separate lab from the Wuhan Virology Institute. They were both located closely together in a less populous area. The Wuhan CDC was a level 2 lab with lower security level than the level 4 biohazard lab of the Wuhan Virology Institute which handled the most dangerous viruses.
Why was the Wuhan CDC Level 2 Institute moved on December 2, 2019? There is some circumstantial evidence in terms of satellite surveillance of hospital parking lots that there was something unusual going on as early as mid-November with respect to attendance and/or admittance at the hospitals. This may have been due to what became known as COVID-19.
Why was the Wuhan CDC Level 2 Institute moved to its present location in Wuhan. The answer is that it is closer to the Wet Market. One may assume that both purchases and sales of live animals were done at the market.
It is difficult to undertand though why the CDC Level 2 Institute was moved to a high density location in terms of population rather than to a more remote area. It couldn't be solely because of close proximity to a Wet Market for sake of convenience. One may conjecture that it was where there were more medical facilities with isolation units to handle an outbreak of COVID-19 which had already begun.
Would the relationship between the Wuhan CDC Level 2 Institute and the Wuhan Virology Institute have necessitated a move? This is a distinct possibility if the move was intended to curtail or cut-off the spread of a virus from a Level 2 to a Level 4 facility. One may assume that safety procedures at the Level 4 facility were were intensified even if procedures at the Level 2 facility may have been temporarily compromised in a potentially unplanned and quick move to downtown Wuhan. It may be also that the Level 2 facility was designated as the sole institution to contact with the Wet Market.
D. Carlton Rossi
September 14, 2021
Canadian author Elaine Dewar’s book raises troubling questions about the origins of COVID-19
September 10, 2021
Marsha Lederman
by Windsor, Ont.-based publisher Biblioasis, the book reads almost like a detective novel.
Ultimately, mainstream publications began to report seriously about the lab theory. Were you thinking that from the beginning?
I’m not sure what I was thinking until I began to understand that some of the [scientific] publications were quite deceptive and that really set the hair up on the back of my neck. [One Chinese scientist submitted two papers with different information to different science journals on the same day]. I mean, when I hit upon that, I was just gobsmacked. Because there’s no possibility that you can publish two papers saying quite different things on the same day, and allow those two papers to continue to circulate, without any reference back and forth between them.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books/article-canadian-author-elaine-dewars-book-raises-troubling-questions-about/
September 10, 2021
Marsha Lederman
by Windsor, Ont.-based publisher Biblioasis, the book reads almost like a detective novel.
Ultimately, mainstream publications began to report seriously about the lab theory. Were you thinking that from the beginning?
I’m not sure what I was thinking until I began to understand that some of the [scientific] publications were quite deceptive and that really set the hair up on the back of my neck. [One Chinese scientist submitted two papers with different information to different science journals on the same day]. I mean, when I hit upon that, I was just gobsmacked. Because there’s no possibility that you can publish two papers saying quite different things on the same day, and allow those two papers to continue to circulate, without any reference back and forth between them.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books/article-canadian-author-elaine-dewars-book-raises-troubling-questions-about/
人类病毒
Human Virome
Telecommunication executives in China will be subject to rectification or correction which has a retributive aspect unless they self-educate themselves to censor informational chaos through rules and restrictions which in turn threaten rectification to their customers who may neglect to re-examine and re-educate themselves through self analysis. It is literally a chain of rectification. In layman's terms, it simply means don't criticize the government.
We are led to believe that stricter controls are a natural outcome of the situation after the COVID-19 outbreak. Clearly, the author needs more introspection to believe it is a natural outcome rather than a power play. It is difficult to be in-line with either One Thought policy of Socialism with Chinese characteristics or with No Thought of a Minority Government of One in Canada which wishes to extend its authoritarian socialist mandate. Frankly, the introspection results in cognitve dissonance and short-circuiting of synaptical connections.
The author is aware that his body is composed of bacteria and viruses. His gut instinct is that he must be defined by bacteria. There are up to 500 in his gut. However, on second self-examination--over a period of minutes--he is convinced the answer is viruses. In nature, viruses outnumber bacteria by 10-1. He has a unique "human virome" and it constantly changes. That means he must spend every minute if not every second of his life at self-examination. How he has time to do anything else except self-examination to avoid rectification is beyond his limited knowledge or ability.
Any self-examinatiion must start with definition. In this case, it must begin with the definition of "human virome". It is the total collection of viruses in and on the human body. His viruses are rapidly evolving and his human virome is quite dynamic. It seems rather chaotic. He will have to brush up on the technique of deep sequencing. Maybe he'll throw in a little ultradeep and a bit of transcritome sequencing.
Normally, he would look outside of himself to understand about viruses. For example, he would seek the advice of scientists at the Wuhan Institutue of Virology. Their scientists are experts on coronavirues at the Biosafety Level 4 Lab. In particular, they have extensive experience with bat viruses that can cause SARS-like coronaviruses with the potential for human transmission. Their avowed mission is to prevent future epidemics and not cause epidemics perhaps through lax security standards as some have claimed. However, while security standards may have been lax; nevertheless, secrecy is drum tight so consultation with experts is difficult. Let's be unbiased. One may say the same thing about the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, Canada--especially with the Qiu revelations.
Therefore, more self-examination is required for a person to understand himself/herself. It is rather ironical that while the threat of rectification is intended to induce compliance with one point of view in order to establish harmony its effect may be the opposite. One may realize that one's own human virome is unique and therefore the individual is unique. It seems rather chaotic to have 1.4 billion Chinese come to the self-realization that they have a unique human virome.
As a result of his newly discovered individuality, the author wonders if he was exposed to SARS when he lived in Beijing at the time of the SARS pandemic in 2003. He lived right across from a restaurant which was newly converted to a SARS hospital. He will have to search within himself for the RNA genome of SARS-HCoV.
He wonders (to himself only) why Canadian health experts didn't remember in 2020 how easily SARS spread from Beijing to Toronto in February 2003. Patient Zero was a woman who booked into the Metropole Hotel in Hong Kong and then returned to her home in Toronto. Severe acute respiratory syndrome killed 44 Canadians. Forty-four is a very unlucky number for Chinese. It became a more unlucky number for the Canadians who died.
Furthermore, he asks himself in an effort of self-discovery why Ottawa would dismantle the early pandemic warning system called Global Public Health Intelligence Network or GPHIN? It was set-up in 1997. The early warning system was cancelled on May 24, 2019 or two weeks before Dr. QIU Xiangguo was escorted out of the Level 4 Security section of the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg. She had made at least five trips to the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences between 2017-2018, which was certified for BSL4 in January 2017. While she had been in Canada for 23 years it is somewhat murky if she were classified as a Canadian citizen, permanent resident or a Chinese national.
It is commonly hyped that GPHIN ceased to exist "less than a year before the COVID-19 pandemic began". However, self-analysis through Jungian depth psychology reveals to the author that it was less than six months after Dr. Qiu was escorted out of the lab for breach of protocol before the discovery of a SARS-like coronavirus on December 30, 2019 at 7:00 pm. That was the exact time at which samples arrived at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Historically, GPHIN I had detected that something was going on in China with regard to infectious diseases. Dr. Ron St. John, Director General, Centre for Emergency Preparedness and Response with the Public Health Agency of Canada reported that in late 2002 and early 2003 an influenza or early SARS was detected in China. However, he said that it was a new disease for which there was no test. From this system GPHIN II developed which gathers and disseminates data in a "real-time, 24/7" basis.
If authorities were to self-examine themselves regarding decisions they made regarding dismantlement of early warning virus detection systems they might ask the following. Was the decision to end GPHIN linked to the dismantling of Predict? The Trump administration cut funding for Predict which had identified 160 different viruses that had the potential to develop into pandemics. It was run by the US Agency for International Development which had instituted the program in 2009. The program was terminated in September 2019 just three months before it was believed COVID-19 began infecting people in Wuhan, Hubei.
Of course, authorites will say they cut programs to cut costs. However, it almost seems that with cancellation of programs so close together in time they may have been aware of what might transpire. Cancellations meant an absence of evidence which would allow for plausible deniability. For example, did US authorites know before September 2019 that a US Harvard professor allegedly became a Strategic Scientist beginning in 2011 at Wuhan University of Technology in China? In Canada, the early warning system was disbanded two weeks before Dr. Qiu, her husband and her students were escorted out of the Level 4 Lab in Winnipeg. CBC News reported that one of the scientists was "responsible for exporting [Ebola and Henipah] pathogens to the Wuhan Institute of Virology" some four months before July 5, 2019 or the day of expulsion. Do these incidents exhibit coincidence or rather correspondence?
The Chinese early warning system for infectious diseases was established in 2004. It is called the National Notifiable Disease Reporting System (NNDRS) which is operated by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). According to Manoj Harjani who is a Research Fellow with Future Issues and Technology "China’s early warning system may have been hampered by its reliance on case information obtained after diagnosis rather than analysis of pre-diagnosis risk factors." One thinks of the expression "Closing the stable door after the horse has bolted".
Recently, according to a report in the British Medical Journal dated October 26, 2020, there is a call for a national intelligent syndromic surveillance system (NISSS) in China. It would incorporate real-time data to forecast an epidemic accurately and robustly in order to guide the epidemic control and prevention work. One wonders how much NISSS resembles GPHIN II?
The author's self-examination should not exclude SARS-CoV-2. In February, he self-isolated for three weeks with severe bronchitis and pneumonia at least as they were discoverable through his self-diagnosis. Obviously, it will be necessary as part of his self-examination to administer to himself the SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic-acid Amplification Test. That will tell him whether or not he has had COVID-19.
In summary, self-examination has taught the author that he is a collection of viruses. He may have had SARS-HCoV which originated in Guangzhou, Guangdong. He probably had SARS-CoV-2 which originated in Wuhan, Hubei. He has received many Chinese vaccines over the last three decades. His unique human virome is more Chinese than he thought it was. Indeed, he is not what he eats, but rather the viruses to which he has been exposed.
D. Carlton Rossi
2020年11月1日
2月，北京一处河岸雪地上悼念李文亮的文字。李文亮曾对新冠病毒的严峻性发出警告，但被当局噤声，他死于Covid-19。
In February, Li Wenliang's words mourned on the snow on a river bank in Beijing. Li Wenliang once warned of the severity of the new coronavirus, but was silenced by the authorities and he died of Covid-19.
Dr. Li Wenliang 李文亮
本文与非营利调查新闻编辑室ProPublica联合发表。
2月7日凌晨,中国强大的互联网审查机构感受到了一种陌生又深刻的不安。他们感觉自己正在失去控制权。
李文亮死于新冠的消息迅速传开，这位医生曾警告说有一种奇怪的新病毒暴发，但遭到警方训诫，并被指控散布谣言。悲痛和愤怒在社交媒体上蔓延。对国内外的民众来说，李文亮之死表明了中国政府压制负面信息的本能所带来的可怕代价。
Adam Maida for Propublica
This article was published jointly with ProPublica, a non-profit investigative news editorial office.
In the early morning of February 7, China's powerful Internet censorship agencies felt a strange and deep anxiety. They feel that they are losing control.
News of Li Wenliang's death from the new crown spread quickly. The doctor had warned of a strange new virus outbreak, but was reprimanded by the police and accused of spreading rumors. Grief and anger spread on social media. For people at home and abroad, the death of Li Wenliang shows the terrible cost of the Chinese government's instinct to suppress negative information.
https://cn.nytimes.com/china/20201219/china-coronavirus-censorship/
李文亮是福建省厦门市D.Carlton Rossi的眼科医生，之后搬到湖北省武汉市
李文亮 was the ophthalmologist of D.Carlton Rossi in Xiamen,Fujian Province prior to his move to Wuhan, Hubei Province
李文亮与武汉市的关系最为密切，因为他毕业于武汉大学的眼科专家，后来回到武汉工作并建立了家庭，最后在冠状病毒危机中担任举报人。 尽管如此，他还是在福建厦门工作了几年。 具体来说，他曾在厦门大学厦门眼科中心工作。
While Li Wenliang may be most closely associated with the city of Wuhan because he graduated as an opthamologist from its university and later returned to work and establish a family in Wuhan while finally acting as a whistleblower in the coronavirus crisis; nevertheless, he worked in Xiamen, Fujian Province for several years. Specifically, he worked at the the Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University (厦门大学厦门眼科中心).
The first Chinese eyechart which is otherwise a poem was designed by D. Carlton Rossi and presented to Dr. Li by D.Carlton Rossi. The chart is called Mountain over Mountain (in translation).
However, one should note that there is a second version of this "poem". It resembles an inverted Wasp Nest inspired by Dante's Inferno.
北京在新发地市场的新COVID-19集群
Social Unrest and COVID-19
Let me point out the obvious which is unrecognized by most. Sun Dawu (孙大午) was detained during the COVID-19 pandemic by Baoding police in Xushui county of Baoding, Hebei Province. It is true that the spread of the virus had subsided in China itself by the time of his arrest on November 11, 2020; however, it was only several months after martial law had been declared in Baoding on June 15, 2020. The city was under martial law due to an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 quite far away in Xinfadi which had spread to Beijing. It seems it was an existentialist crisis only in Baoding because of trading ties with the market in Xinfadi which has the largest trading volume in Asia.
Were Baoding officials really more concerned about a decades' old land dispute in Langwuzhuang at Sun's village between Dawu Group and Xushui State Farm? It may be so because on June 21, 2020 personnel from both groups clashed. A dispute broke out again on August 04, 2020 when the state-farm personnel allegedly tried to demolish the Dawu office in the middle of the night. The incident left 20 people injured. The point is that Xushui and Baoding officials tend to overeact to any kind of social unrest at the time of a pandemic because it is perceived to be able to potentially spark greater discontent over a wider area.
Another obvious observation is that Sun was arrested on May 27, 2003 at the height of the SARS crisis which had hit the capital of Beijing quite hard. Previous to the author's house arrest on that date he had lived for several months right across from an improvised hospital set-up to treat SARS patients. In order to enter the village to establish a college in the Fall the author had to undergo a whole series of tests including X-rays, blood tests and temperature scans to prove he was not infected. Until Sun's arrest though the police had been unaware of his presence at the village.
The author wishes also to bring to the reader's attention the importance of the date of November 11, 2020 which is known as Remembrance Day in the West. Sun had reason to remember the anniversary of that date for another reason. It was the seventeenth anniversary of the verdict of his trial. It is without doubt that he was arrested on November 11, 2020 because it is the date of that anniversary. It was a clear message to Sun. Dawu Group was taken over in 2020 as it had been in 2003.
Let me point out the obvious which is unrecognized by most. Sun Dawu (孙大午) was detained during the COVID-19 pandemic by Baoding police in Xushui county of Baoding, Hebei Province. It is true that the spread of the virus had subsided in China itself by the time of his arrest on November 11, 2020; however, it was only several months after martial law had been declared in Baoding on June 15, 2020. The city was under martial law due to an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 quite far away in Xinfadi which had spread to Beijing. It seems it was an existentialist crisis only in Baoding because of trading ties with the market in Xinfadi which has the largest trading volume in Asia.
Were Baoding officials really more concerned about a decades' old land dispute in Langwuzhuang at Sun's village between Dawu Group and Xushui State Farm? It may be so because on June 21, 2020 personnel from both groups clashed. A dispute broke out again on August 04, 2020 when the state-farm personnel allegedly tried to demolish the Dawu office in the middle of the night. The incident left 20 people injured. The point is that Xushui and Baoding officials tend to overeact to any kind of social unrest at the time of a pandemic because it is perceived to be able to potentially spark greater discontent over a wider area.
Another obvious observation is that Sun was arrested on May 27, 2003 at the height of the SARS crisis which had hit the capital of Beijing quite hard. Previous to the author's house arrest on that date he had lived for several months right across from an improvised hospital set-up to treat SARS patients. In order to enter the village to establish a college in the Fall the author had to undergo a whole series of tests including X-rays, blood tests and temperature scans to prove he was not infected. Until Sun's arrest though the police had been unaware of his presence at the village.
The author wishes also to bring to the reader's attention the importance of the date of November 11, 2020 which is known as Remembrance Day in the West. Sun had reason to remember the anniversary of that date for another reason. It was the seventeenth anniversary of the verdict of his trial. It is without doubt that he was arrested on November 11, 2020 because it is the date of that anniversary. It was a clear message to Sun. Dawu Group was taken over in 2020 as it had been in 2003.
You can be sure that 50 million farmers who have had land confiscated with little compensation paid attention to the plight of Dawu Group and Sun Dawu. Sun's case strikes a chord or should one say discord among them. The plight of Sun and Dawu Group has brought land reform to the forefront as a national issue.
When Sun was arrested he was called a pig farmer. Why is that because only one of 28 subsidiaries was involved with a pig farm and it was closer to the capital than Langwuzhuang? The reason is that Sun gained international notoriety for whistleblowing about the Swine Flu epidemic in Hebei Province. He lost 15,000 pigs even though Hebei Province did not admit to any other clusters, so how did it spread to his farm if it wasn't more prevalent? The provincial government didn't like questions like that. They were also worried about unrest among farmers who owned millions of pig farms throughout China and higher pork prices that consumers had to pay. Sun wasn't allowed to make any more comments after February 22, 2019 on his blog at http://sundawu1.blog.sohu.com/.
Wuhan-COVID-19 HIV-
COVID-19 began in Wuhan about mid-December. From January 23rd to April 8th or 76 days it was under shutdown or lockdown to contain the disease. What else is Wuhan known for aside from a transportation hub where bullet trains can take troops in a matter of hours to any point of insurrection on the frontiers? The Xinhai Revolution began there in 1911 which overthrew the Qing Dynasty. Earlier discontent has erupted in Sichuan Province when two privately owned railways were nationalized or taken over by the government.
Manchurian Plague 1910-1911
One factor that set the stage for the revolution was The Great Manchurian Plague that broke out across northeastern China in 1910. It was suppressed in the following year after 63,000 people had died from pneumonic plague. It was probably carried on the rail line by the Tarbagan marmot from the steppes around Khukh Lake, Mongolia to Harbin. It also travelled by rail from Beijing to Wuhan. The last Qing Emperor or Puyi (溥儀) was known as Khevt Yos Khaan in Mongolia until his abdication.
It appears that Baoding overreacted to two cases of COVID-19 by declaring martial law. A male from Baoding who worked as a driver and purchasing agent at the seafood market of Xinfadi where he lived showed symptoms on June 6. A vendor at the market from Baoding who lived at the market showed symptoms on June 10. It begs the question why did Baoding declare martial law because of only two individuals in Xinfadi outside of Beijing and Wuhan didn't when the locals claim 42,000 died from the epidemic? It seems that authorities in Wuhan wanted to give the impression that the situation was under control with lockdown while those in Baoding wanted to exaggerate the situation by declaring martial law because they are concerned about losing control in matters other than the virus.
D. Carlton Rossi
2020年12月11日
The Baibuting Banquet
《静观天灾人祸》
一场瘟疫动地哀，十面无语问天灾！病毒若是自人祸，蔓延世界谁制裁？ 后代秦人从未悔，指鹿为马毁基台。华夏百姓翘首待，反腐结出硕果来！
《Watching the Scourge》
A plague moved with sorrow, and asked nothing about the natural disaster! If the virus is self-inflicting, who will punish the spread through the world? The descendants of Qin never regretted it, referring to the deer destroying the abutment for the horse. The Chinese people are waiting forward, and anti-corruption bears fruit!
孙大午
今天 09:16 来自 iPhone客户端
《静观天灾人祸》
One might begin the story of the Baibuting Banquet with a dinner party of 20 participants in the city of Xiamen in terms of contrast. It was an open meeting of activists and rights lawyers on December 13, 2019 in order to discuss administrative issues. It aroused the suspicions of authorities as any dinner party with more than five guests is subject to scrutiny and could be considered unlawful. Several participants were arrested and an arrest warrant was put out for XU Zhiyong (许志永).
Xu was the founder of The New Citizens' Movement (新公民運動). It promoted "political transformation leading to democratic rule of law, as well as a cultural movement for the renewal of political and cultural traditions". Xu was able to avoid arrest for two months while on the run. In his last post written on February 14, 2020 (or the day before his arrest) he wrote "This nationwide calamity could only happen without democracy and freedom of speech,". "While the public are distressed for Dr. Li and their country, the Communist Party hides in the shadows and acts as eyes and ears. In their hearts, there is no right and wrong, no conscience, no bottom line, no humanity."
On the other hand, the Baibuting Banquet was held for the twentieth time on January 18, 2020 in the Jiangan District of Wuhan. This district borders the Jianghan District within which may be found the The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market (武汉华南海鲜批发市场). The geographical closeness of the districts is mentioned because participants in the banquet might prepare their dishes from food found at the seafood market. In fact, the more exotic the ingredients then the more likely it would qualify for an original dish. The market was known more for its exotic, wild animals (which have now been banned for sale across China) than for its seafood.
The mayor of Wuhan was Zhou Xianwang (周先旺). Of course, he is not freely elected by the populace, but his power derives from his role as Deputy Party Committee Secretary. Zhou wanted to set a Guiness world record with the number of dishes and participants at the Baibuting Banquet. As a matter of fact, 40,000 families attended the banquet to break the record.
Three days before the banquet an organizing committee warned Zhou that a virus had been spreading in Wuhan. From his own sources he had been apprised of the cases and situation. The Deputy Party Committee Secretary said there is not enough warning and the event would continue. He becomes a figure like Trimalchio or "Thrice King" from Petronius' Satyricon who "in his drunken showiness leads to the entire household acting out his funeral, all for his own amusement and egotism."
Both Zhou and his superior Ma Guoqiang (马国强) who was Deputy Communist Party Secretary of Hubei and Communist Party Secretary of Wuhan were removed from office for dereliction of duty. Ma was removed on February 13, 2020. This was a day before Xu Zhiyong's defence of Li Wenliang (李文亮) in terms of freedom of speech.
There are currently three possible sources of transmission for COVID-19 which may be related. The first and foremost is the Wuhan Institute of Virology or WIV (中国科学院武汉病毒研究所) located in the Jingxia District which has China's only Biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) facility. The institute experiments on coronavirus genes. A team led by Shi Zhengli were the first to identify, analyze and name the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) on behalf of WIV which applied for a patent in China for the use of Remdesivir--an experimental drug owned by Gilead Sciences. The team denies that COVID-19 which has unusual mutated genes of Ebola and HIV was designed by and leaked from the lab. It is conceivable perhaps that monkeys experimented upon might have been sold to the Wuhan Seafood Market.
The second possible source of transmission of COVID-19 was the Wuhan Seafood Market (武汉华南海鲜批发市场) of Jianghan District. While it sells seafood its notoriety and now one may say infamy stems from the sale of exotic, wild animals. Many of the first cases including those reported by Dr. Li Wenliang may have originated from the market.
Finally,the Wuhan Jiangan District Baibuting Community held its 20th annual food fest or banquet on January 18, 2020 which was just prior to the Spring Festival beginning on January 25, 2020. It is speculated that many of the 13986 entrants who submitted dishes may have visited the Wuhan Seafood Market to secure food. Over 40,000 families or more than 130,000 people participated in the event. It so happens that family units became the fastest way to transmit the virus. As a result, the Baibuting Residential Community in Jiangan District was hit hardest by COVID-I9.
It is said that a virus like that which causes the common cold or influenza doesn't want to kill its host, but rather to replicate or reproduce itself in other hosts. The same can be said of COVID-19. Its defining characteristic is its ability to infect rather than do away with its host. However, the virus can be quite lethal because it has mutated genes of Ebola and HIV which affects a small percentage of the population. This means the more people the virus infects the greater the number of those who succumb to it.
One might think of containment as a crude method to control a coronavirus. It may be happenstance or designed. For example, the purpose of a cruise ship is to provide a sense of luxury and leisure. However, by containing the virus like COVID-19 to a small area with improper quarantine methods leads by happenstance to a high fatality rate among older passengers who may not have before been in the best of health. That explains why on the Diamond Princess ship there were six fatalities among the 705 reported cases.
In a similar way, apartment buildings in the Baibuting Residential Area were built for the well-being of their residents. However, if older residents who were weak in body or health are forcibly contained in a building which was not intended to be a closed environment then the number of fatal cases increases. Perhaps only one in five people of a family of the banquet for families was infected with the coronavirus in an open environment such as the banquet itself or seafood market. However, when authorities improperly quarantine the family within their apartment inside a quaranteened apartment building then the fatality rate rises. This was the case throughout the Baibuting Residential area. In a more general sense, it applies to the quaranteened city of Wuhan, too.
AI, 5G, facial recognition, Smart City and Social Credit System were designed to control a population of 1.4 billion people. One might say that combined they form a grand scale re-education program. If control of an individual(s) is difficult then these technologies resort to containment and isolation.
While technologies such as facial recognition of people were not intended to control viruses such as African Swine Flu (ASF); nevertheless, they were employed on large, industrial farms of swine. The idea was to identify sick pigs by facial recognition and behaviour so that they could be culled before they infected the herd--in other words containment and isolation. The main problem with this approach is that the presence of only one pig can infect a herd of 1 million. The result was that it didn't reduce the spread of ASF in China.
These so-called smart technologies were also employed to control the spread of COVID-19 with mutated Ebola and HIV genes. Again, they were not designed to deal with a novel coronavirus which was most probably engineered in a secret, Biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) facility in Wuhan under the aegis of the military. None of these technologies can detect the invisible, so to speak.The incubation period for COVID-19 varies from about 5 days to perhaps 21 days. Furthermore, some cases are asymptomatic meaning they present no symptoms of disease at any stage. This means that even if one case is missed then it can infect an entire population. The attempts by authorities to Red Flag individuals who show unusual patterns of behaviour (as recognized by technologies designed for another purpose) in order to contain and isolate them are bound to fail. These technologies only give the appearance of authority in order to justify what may be application of arbitrary standards to contain and isolate. They do not reduce the spread of COVID-19 in China.
Residents of the Baibuting Residential Community were particularly hard hit since many had been at the 'Ten Thousand Family Banquet'. The local hospital was full. Some patients were quarantined at a hotel. Many others were quarantined in local compounds; for example, Anju, Lily, Yikang and Kanghe. Finally, all Wuhan was forcibly contained so what ended up was containment within containment. The peoples' cries for help go unheeded. All they can do for now about the corruption is watch the scourge. Vice wears a virus crown. The thrice king crowned for life wears a corona.
D. Carlton Rossi
https://en.australia51.com/article/87FD1ED5-1166-90E8-B8DC-AB55E0DBF2D5/
https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2020/01/26/amid-deadly-virus-outbreak-china-tried-to-hold-worlds-largest-banquet/
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/commentary/wuhan-virus-pneumonia-coronavirus-challenge-china-xi-jinping-12311194
https://www.theepochtimes.com/wuhan-neighborhood-infected-with-coronavirus-after-families-attend-banquet_3238635.html
https://www.forbes.com/sites/victoriaforster/2020/02/28/six-people-from-the-diamond-princess-cruise-ship-have-now-died-from-covid-19-after-quarantine-failure/#2465c1823654
http://jawdrops.com/weird-records-8146-dishes/comment-page-1/
18日武汉百步亭社区万家宴，4万家庭，共13余万人参加
生活日常2020-01-20 14:01:16
5.0万播放 · 204弹幕
http://n.miaopai.com/media/ghcc6kftivEM0nOSKtppLR2uFpP5wrvm
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3047720/chinese-premier-li-keqiang-head-coronavirus-crisis-team-outbreak
https://www.weibo.com/u/2646367831
https://www.wfuv.org/content/rights-activist-xu-zhiyong-arrested-china-amid-crackdown-dissent
孙大午,Sun Dawu, 孙大午,被捕11112020,刘会茹,Dawu Group,大午集团 ,私营企业主立宪制度,徐水国营农场,大午农牧集团有限公司,河北省,徐水县郎,五庄,2020年11月11日,November 11,2020,1911,辛亥革命,孫德明, 三民主义,Unirule,天则经济研究所,茅于轼,土地扣押,农民,农业集体 伦理资,本主义,D.Carlton Rossi,拆迁,寻衅滋事,709案,709大抓捕,警察,皇帝,保护伞,儒,武汉华南海鲜批发市场,中国科学院武汉病毒研究所
Sun Dawu,孙大午,Liu Huiru, Dawu Group,DAWU GROUP, Private Entrepreneur Constitutional System, Dawu Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Group Co., Ltd.,Langwuzhuang, Xushui County, Hebei Province, November 11, 2020, November 11,2020,1911,Xinhai Revolution,Sun Deming,Three Principles of the People,Unirule, Tianze Economic Research Institute,Mao Yushi,land seizure,farmers,agricultural collective,ethical capitalism,D. Carlton Rossi,demolition and relocation,picking quarrels and provoking troubles,709 case,709 crackdown,police,protective umbrella,Confucianism,Yellow Emperor Huangdi,The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market,National Institute of Virology,Winnipeg,National Institute of Virology,Wuhan,Dr.Qiu
Sun Dawu,孙大午,Liu Huiru, Dawu Group,DAWU GROUP, Private Entrepreneur Constitutional System, Dawu Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Group Co., Ltd.,Langwuzhuang, Xushui County, Hebei Province, November 11, 2020, November 11,2020,1911,Xinhai Revolution,Sun Deming,Three Principles of the People,Unirule, Tianze Economic Research Institute,Mao Yushi,land seizure,farmers,agricultural collective,ethical capitalism,D. Carlton Rossi,demolition and relocation,picking quarrels and provoking troubles,709 case,709 crackdown,police,protective umbrella,Confucianism,Yellow Emperor Huangdi,The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market,National Institute of Virology,Winnipeg,National Institute of Virology,Wuhan,Dr.Qiu